Kodak Reviews

Yeh i jsut use this on my Compaq Ipaq and its great, does all i want it to do... so thumbs up for PDA use

On our trip, we packed about 60 photos plus a couple of short videos on each of three Kodak 64MB MultiMedia Cards. The memory seemed endless and reliable.

I had one problem with a card becoming corrupted. I had photos on the card, but could not retrieve them and save to my PC. Kodak said the only solution was to format the card. I lost what photos I had on there, but the card worked fine after that. The card is extremely small and easy to lose. It's like carrying around a postage stamp. I can't believe they can get 64MB in there.

This card works fine, but here is the bitter truth.

The core of all the cards (known in technical terms as the "controller") are made by only a few DRAM manufacturers. Those handful of DRAM manufacturers then sell the "controllers" to the major flash card manufacturers (i.e. SanDisk, Kodak, Olympus, and Viking). The flash card manufacturers then simply throw some plastic casings on the controllers, slap on a label, and ship the cards. As long as the flash card manufacturer is reputable, has a good warranty, and has been around for over 5 years; you will be just fine.

What I am trying to get at? I simply want to make it clear that you should not buy a card based solely on the fact it is made by Kodak. Check the pricing against the other major manufacturers (i.e. SanDisk, Viking, etc.) and then make your decision.

Decent price. Holds many pictures. Respectable industry name. A winner.

I use this 64-meg memory card in my Kodak DC4800 camera, in my HP Handheld (660LX) computer, AND in my old Kodak DC50 camera also. (My handheld computer and DC50 camera both require an adapter.) Works great -- I have not encountered a single problem.

This card can hold about 65 pictures in the best-quality JPG format from my DC4800 camera. When shooting in the highest-quality mode (TIFF format), I can get only about 10 pictures on this card. For those times when I shoot in the TIFF mode, I bought the bigger 128meg Kodak card which holds twice as much.

I have a Digital Wallet 6-gig storage device onto which I download pictures from the chip when I'm on the road, and as should be expected - this Kodak card works fine there too.

These cards come pre-formatted for Windows but you can reformat them for Mac computers.

These great Kodak cards are reliable ...

...

Are you looking for a reliable compact multi card reader? Look no further. This usb 2.0 card reader reads and writes CompactFlash (CF), Secure Digital (SD), Multimedia (MMC) and SmartMedia cards plus Memory Sticks and IBM Microdrives. I've used the CF, SD, and SmartMedia slots many times and have never had any problems. I use it on my Windows XP, and the card reader uses Mass Storage Compliance technology so there is no need for drivers. Just plug it in and transfer your files faster than you can dream of compared to direct link from your digi cam or pda.

This card works fine, but here is the bitter truth.

The core of all the cards (known in technical terms as the "controller") are made by only a few DRAM manufacturers. Those handful of DRAM manufacturers then sell the "controllers" to the major flash card manufacturers (i.e. SanDisk, Kodak, Olympus, and Viking). The flash card manufacturers then simply throw some plastic casings on the controllers, slap on a label, and ship the cards. As long as the flash card manufacturer is reputable, has a good warranty, and has been around for over 5 years; you will be just fine.

What I am trying to get at? I simply want to make it clear that you should not buy a card based solely on the fact it is made by Kodak. Check the pricing against the other major manufacturers (i.e. SanDisk, Viking, etc.) and then make your decision.

I have one that has 64MB. I can take over 150 pictures on it and I am also able to use it with my Compaq iPAQ Pocket PC.