Kodak Reviews

I have Kodak Express El Fayrouz in Cairo-Egypt, I use digital
camera to match and this USB cabler is faster 40 time than the serial cable and very easy to conect. So would you please send it ASAP.Thanks
I am more than 50 years age, I am the owner for Photo shop Kodak Express El Fayrouz

I own a kodak digital camera, and this was an absolute necessity to transfer my images to my PC. Now I can share my precious photos across the internet, and print directly from Kodak's easy interface! None of this would have been possible without this cable.

After further review, I've changed my rating.

I got this sample pack of Kodak paper free when I purchased my Canon i850 (which also came with a sample pack of the Canon Photo Paper Pro).

The Kodak paper is not as good as the Photo Paper Pro. I've had the best success printing on it with the paper type set to Photo Paper Pro. The pictures printed on it are less glossy then those printed on the Photo Paper Pro and show banding. Also the paper seems to respond poorly to chnages in temperature and humidity.

The paper itself is 1/2" too long (4"x6.5") which can leave a white border on one end if you don't adjust for it.

I wouldn't buy this paper, but it's worth getting the free package to try for yourself.

I agree with the other reviews...canon paper for canon printers is best..but you CAN get decent quality from Kodak...just go to their site and write down the recommended settings and voila!

This is excellent paper for colour and b/w photographs on a Canon i560. It is far superior, especially with dark colours, to the equivalent Fuji 270g paper.

This classic Kodak high speed black and white film still holds its own against its newer competitors because of its versatility. It is one of the few films that can be easily pushed and yet still retain much of its shadow detail. However, it isn't the best; I believe Ilford HP5 Plus is better than Tri-X for shadow detail and contrast. And of course Kodak T-MAX 400 and Ilford Delta 400 are vastly superior with regards to shadow detail and contrast. Still, one can't go wrong using this high speed black and white film; a classic that is still worth using.

I have used Tri-X Pan at EI 3200 and even 6400, developed in Rodinol. Tri-X was introduced in the 1950's, Rodinol in the 1890's. Such a combination produces low-light performance that is quite remarkable. Now we have T-Max 3200, which has much greater speed, but was not introduced until the 1980's.
In the 1950's, 1960's, and to some extent 1970's, if you wanted to shoot in dim light, it was Tri-X Pan.

This film is classic stuff. A bit grainy, but extremely forgiving of questionable exposure times and screwy processing conditions and therefore great for a darkroom knucklehead like me. Plus, it's cheap and readily available; in this color-oriented day and age, few other B&W films are either.

This is one of my favorite films. If you like smooth toned black and white shots, with little grain, great detail, and a bit of a silvery-gray feel to them, use Tri-X. With a 400 ISO, it can handle a wide range of conditions, and has a lot of latitude in development.

I have other choices for when I'm looking for a more old-time feel (Efke 50 or 100) or when I'm looking for the impact of a grainy film (Ilford 3200), but Tri-X Pan is probably the best Black and White film for everyday that I've used.

I've found that this film Can't be beat. I'd rather spend the extra few dollars to get better looking pictures. I've shot this film out of my Howell+Bell point and shoot as well as my Canon Rebel G with very pleasing results both ways. a few tips I've found for shooting B&W use a R2(Red) Filter For better contrast, the pictures turn out sharper and Clearer depending on the lens your using. I shoot with Sigma's AF but I think it's the only way to go with a Canon Camrea. none the less, this film Can't be beat. SLR or point and shoot you can't go wrong.

I've had GREAT results shooting with TRI-X -- even on a point and shoot pocket camera. It's the only Kodak film I go out of my way to buy (Fuji is my preference for 35mm color).

Images are sharp and have excellent contrast - even in gray/lower light scenes (outdoor shots on a rainy day came out exceptionally well). TRI-X particularly showed better depth of field than the regular Kodak Select B&W film - it's worth the price to get sharp, professional looking images.